Good as the predecessors??
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Warner Bros is on a spree of making sequels and remakes beloved franchises this year well Tom and Jerry and Space Jam a New Legacy were disappointments, I feared Matrix Resurrections will be a cheese cash grabber capitalizing on the nostalgia of the original Matrix trilogy. It is such a relief that Matrix Resurrections never felt like a cash grabber it has a heart tries movie on itself. What made the original Matrix o great was it was unique there was nothing like that came out at that time. So after almost twenty years, it is not easy for another entry for the franchise to great as its predecessor. This is what Matrix Resurrections failed to achieve. It is not a bad film it has its moments and payoffs to the franchise but wow factor.
Every movie in a franchise doesn’t need to be a standout but it should have something that will stay with viewers and this is what this movie lacks. Coming to other positives this is an entertaining film and it has cool action sequences and what I like about the movies is the callbacks to the previous movies never felt like forced and as mentioned earlier the movies don’t depend too much on the previous editions in the franchise.
Matrix Resurrections
does not have a good performance that can be remembered. Keanu Reeves and Carrie
-Anne Moss as two leads have their moments to shine but not great as in the
other movies. The dialogues felt too fast it was hard to understand what some
saying. The movie also lacks a good antagonist and of course, the characters
were not flushed out. To conclude Matrix
Resurrections is not a bad movie but it fails to be a perfect film but a solid
entry to the franchise.
- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Comments
Post a Comment